I recently received a question from a married lady who asked Dr. Paul if cyber- sex is considered to be adultery. It is my understanding that it is considered to be adultery in most states. Explicit one on one sexual communication with a member of the opposite or same sex certainly qualifies. The lady is married and is having cyber -sex with another man that she has intimately known from her past. Does it really take a rocket scientist to figure this out? Even if you had not had sex in the past with this person, it still qualifies (according to a law firm that was contacted) as adultery and can be considered to be grounds for divorce. In the event that a pre-nup is involved with an adultery clause (and I am told that they all have unless specifically deleted) the injured party has no obligation of any sort including financial to the other party. A divorce could ensue without question. Porn sites on the other hand are not considered to be adultery since there is no one on one sexual communication contact. The other party may not like it, or they may enjoy it too, but it is not grounds for divorce. If a pre-nup however, specifically addresses a particular action, then the perpetrator could be held accountable.
I know this must not really be a burning question to most of you…oh..it is?…what kind of people are Blogging on Dr. Paul’s site?…Who are you???…Who would have guessed!…Well, just because Dr. Paul’s initials are PRV (really true. my shirts are all monogrammed PRV)…does that mean that everyone else has to be a PRV too???…ZOUNDS! Have I created a Monster?…or maybe because Dr. Paul makes no moral or value judgments, everyone feels really good about sharing their feelings…have at it!